InterSpectrum Journal of Multidisciplinary Research implements a peer-review process to ensure the academic quality, originality, and scholarly contribution of all published articles.

Review Model

The journal applies a double-blind peer review system, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential to ensure objective and independent evaluation.

Review Stages

1. Initial Editorial Screening
   Submitted manuscripts are screened by the editor to ensure alignment with the journal’s focus and scope, compliance with author guidelines, and administrative completeness.

2. Reviewer Assignment
   The editor assigns at least two reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript’s subject area.

3. Peer Review Evaluation
   Reviewers assess the manuscript based on methodological quality, research novelty, clarity of analysis, relevance, and scholarly contribution.

4. Editorial Decision
   Based on reviewer recommendations, the editor issues one of the following decisions:

   • Accepted without revision

   • Accepted with minor revision

   • Accepted with major revision

   • Rejected

5. Author Revision
   Authors are required to revise the manuscript in accordance with reviewer comments within the specified timeframe.

6. Final Decision
   The editor conducts a final evaluation of the revised manuscript before confirming publication.

Confidentiality and Ethics

All manuscripts and review reports are treated as confidential. Reviewers and editors must declare any potential conflicts of interest and uphold academic ethical standards.